Showing posts with label Taliban. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Taliban. Show all posts

Wednesday, 2 May 2012

Two Hours After Obama's Afghanistan Speech Taliban Strike Back

 Less than two hours after President Obama made his Afghanistan, the Taliban have struck back, attacking a foreigners housing compound in Kabul with a suicide car bomb.  The suicide bomber was accompanied by insurgents dressed as women. At least seven people were killed in the attack.

The compound, known as Green Village, houses hundreds of foreign contractors, diplomats and foreign aid workers.  It is located in East Kabul.  While the exterior fence was penetrated the suicide bomber, with two  attackers, were unable to penetrate the interior security fence.  Gun fire and explosions could be heard for hours as Security forces responded. 

Despite the claims made by President Obama in yesterday's speech, the Taliban have demonstrated with two major attacks in less than three weeks that they are still capable of striking the heart of the Afghan capital.  The capital is already heavily guarded and must have had extra security for President Obama's visit.

President Obama during his speech yesterday said:

"We are starting this drawdown from a position of strength. Al Qaeda is under more pressure than at any time since 9/11. Together with the Pakistanis, we have taken out more than half of al Qaeda’s leadership. And thanks to our intelligence professionals and Special Forces, we killed Osama bin Laden, the only leader that al Qaeda had ever known. This was a victory for all who have served since 9/11. One soldier summed it up well. “The message,” he said, “is we don’t forget. You will be held accountable, no matter how long it takes.”

The information that we recovered from bin Laden’s compound shows al Qaeda under enormous strain. Bin Laden expressed concern that al Qaeda has been unable to effectively replace senior terrorists that have been killed, and that al Qaeda has failed in its effort to portray America as a nation at war with Islam – thereby draining more widespread support. Al Qaeda remains dangerous, and we must be vigilant against attacks. But we have put al Qaeda on a path to defeat, and we will not relent until the job is done.


In Afghanistan, we’ve inflicted serious losses on the Taliban and taken a number of its strongholds. Along with our surge, our allies also increased their commitments, which helped stabilize more of the country. Afghan Security Forces have grown by over 100,000 troops, and in some provinces and municipalities we have already begun to transition responsibility for security to the Afghan people. In the face of violence and intimidation, Afghans are fighting and dying for their country, establishing local police forces, opening markets and schools, creating new opportunities for women and girls, and trying to turn the page on decades of war."


Taliban spokesman  Zabiullah Mujahid claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it was a message to Obama that those that have signed the Strategic Partnership Agreement are not Afghans.

 "This was a message to Obama that those are not real Afghans that are signing documents about this country.  The real Afghan nation are those people that are not letting foreign invaders stay in this country or disrespect the dignity of our country."

While Mujahid said that the target was a foreign military base, an ISAF spokesman, Captain  Justin Brockhoff said that no NATO bases came under attack. 

Among military circles some concern has been raised as to the ability of Afghan Security Forces to take over responsibility for the security of Afghanistan.  This is due to apparent drug use, defections and absenteeism.  The Taliban has also been successful in infiltrating Security Forces. 

The Taliban, after the attack three weeks ago, warned that their spring offensive, code-named "Al-Farouk," had started. 

President Hamid Karzai condemned the attack, calling the militants "the slaves of foreigners who don't want Afghan children to learn."

The U.S. is expected to draw down 30,000 troops by  the end of the year and the UK will reduce its contingent by 500.  Australia has announced that its troops will leave Afghanistan by the end of next year.

It is not known how many troops will remain in Afghanistan after 2014.   The cost of the Strategic Partnership Agreement is expected to be $4.2 Billion of which the U.S. has apparently committed to fund at least half.  

Tuesday, 1 May 2012

President Obama's Afghanistan Speech 1 May 2012

On the anniversary of Osama Bin Laden's death, President Obama traveled to Afghanistan to sign a "Strategic Partnership Agreement."  The agreement clears the way for U.S. an NATO withdrawal in 2014.  After the official signing of the treaty, President Obama addressed both the Afghan and American people. 



Full Text of the President's Speech:

Remarks of President Barack Obama – As Prepared for Delivery
On the Way Forward in Afghanistan
Washington, D.C.
June 22, 2011
Good evening. Nearly ten years ago, America suffered the worst attack on our shores since Pearl Harbor. This mass murder was planned by Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda network in Afghanistan, and signaled a new threat to our security – one in which the targets were no longer soldiers on a battlefield, but innocent men, women and children going about their daily lives.

In the days that followed, our nation was united as we struck at al Qaeda and routed the Taliban in Afghanistan. Then, our focus shifted. A second war was launched in Iraq, and we spent enormous blood and treasure to support a new government there. By the time I took office, the war in Afghanistan had entered its seventh year. But al Qaeda’s leaders had escaped into Pakistan and were plotting new attacks, while the Taliban had regrouped and gone on the offensive. Without a new strategy and decisive action, our military commanders warned that we could face a resurgent al Qaeda, and a Taliban taking over large parts of Afghanistan.

For this reason, in one of the most difficult decisions that I’ve made as President, I ordered an additional 30,000 American troops into Afghanistan. When I announced this surge at West Point, we set clear objectives: to refocus on al Qaeda; reverse the Taliban’s momentum; and train Afghan Security Forces to defend their own country. I also made it clear that our commitment would not be open-ended, and that we would begin to drawdown our forces this July.

Tonight, I can tell you that we are fulfilling that commitment. Thanks to our men and women in uniform, our civilian personnel, and our many coalition partners, we are meeting our goals. As a result, starting next month, we will be able to remove 10,000 of our troops from Afghanistan by the end of this year, and we will bring home a total of 33,000 troops by next summer, fully recovering the surge I announced at West Point. After this initial reduction, our troops will continue coming home at a steady pace as Afghan Security forces move into the lead. Our mission will change from combat to support. By 2014, this process of transition will be complete, and the Afghan people will be responsible for their own security.

We are starting this drawdown from a position of strength. Al Qaeda is under more pressure than at any time since 9/11. Together with the Pakistanis, we have taken out more than half of al Qaeda’s leadership. And thanks to our intelligence professionals and Special Forces, we killed Osama bin Laden, the only leader that al Qaeda had ever known. This was a victory for all who have served since 9/11. One soldier summed it up well. “The message,” he said, “is we don’t forget. You will be held accountable, no matter how long it takes.”

The information that we recovered from bin Laden’s compound shows al Qaeda under enormous strain. Bin Laden expressed concern that al Qaeda has been unable to effectively replace senior terrorists that have been killed, and that al Qaeda has failed in its effort to portray America as a nation at war with Islam – thereby draining more widespread support. Al Qaeda remains dangerous, and we must be vigilant against attacks. But we have put al Qaeda on a path to defeat, and we will not relent until the job is done.

In Afghanistan, we’ve inflicted serious losses on the Taliban and taken a number of its strongholds. Along with our surge, our allies also increased their commitments, which helped stabilize more of the country. Afghan Security Forces have grown by over 100,000 troops, and in some provinces and municipalities we have already begun to transition responsibility for security to the Afghan people. In the face of violence and intimidation, Afghans are fighting and dying for their country, establishing local police forces, opening markets and schools, creating new opportunities for women and girls, and trying to turn the page on decades of war.

Of course, huge challenges remain. This is the beginning – but not the end – of our effort to wind down this war. We will have to do the hard work of keeping the gains that we have made, while we drawdown our forces and transition responsibility for security to the Afghan government. And next May, in Chicago, we will host a summit with our NATO allies and partners to shape the next phase of this transition.

We do know that peace cannot come to a land that has known so much war without a political settlement. So as we strengthen the Afghan government and Security Forces, America will join initiatives that reconcile the Afghan people, including the Taliban. Our position on these talks is clear: they must be led by the Afghan government, and those who want to be a part of a peaceful Afghanistan must break from al Qaeda, abandon violence, and abide by the Afghan Constitution. But, in part because of our military effort, we have reason to believe that progress can be made.
The goal that we seek is achievable, and can be expressed simply: no safe-haven from which al Qaeda or its affiliates can launch attacks against our homeland, or our allies. We will not try to make Afghanistan a perfect place. We will not police its streets or patrol its mountains indefinitely. That is the responsibility of the Afghan government, which must step up its ability to protect its people; and move from an economy shaped by war to one that can sustain a lasting peace. What we can do, and will do, is build a partnership with the Afghan people that endures – one that ensures that we will be able to continue targeting terrorists and supporting a sovereign Afghan government.

Of course, our efforts must also address terrorist safe-havens in Pakistan. No country is more endangered by the presence of violent extremists, which is why we will continue to press Pakistan to expand its participation in securing a more peaceful future for this war-torn region. We will work with the Pakistani government to root out the cancer of violent extremism, and we will insist that it keep its commitments. For there should be no doubt that so long as I am President, the United States will never tolerate a safe-haven for those who aim to kill us: they cannot elude us, nor escape the justice they deserve.

My fellow Americans, this has been a difficult decade for our country. We have learned anew the profound cost of war -- a cost that has been paid by the nearly 4500 Americans who have given their lives in Iraq, and the over 1500 who have done so in Afghanistan – men and women who will not live to enjoy the freedom that they defended. Thousands more have been wounded. Some have lost limbs on the field of battle, and others still battle the demons that have followed them home.
Yet tonight, we take comfort in knowing that the tide of war is receding. Fewer of our sons and daughters are serving in harm’s way. We have ended our combat mission in Iraq, with 100,000 American troops already out of that country. And even as there will be dark days ahead in Afghanistan, the light of a secure peace can be seen in the distance. These long wars will come to a responsible end.

As they do, we must learn their lessons. Already this decade of war has caused many to question the nature of America’s engagement around the world. Some would have America retreat from our responsibility as an anchor of global security, and embrace an isolation that ignores the very real threats that we face. Others would have America over-extend ourselves, confronting every evil that can be found abroad.

We must chart a more centered course. Like generations before, we must embrace America’s singular role in the course of human events. But we must be as pragmatic as we are passionate; as strategic as we are resolute. When threatened, we must respond with force – but when that force can be targeted, we need not deploy large armies overseas. When innocents are being slaughtered and global security endangered, we don’t have to choose between standing idly by or acting on our own. Instead, we must rally international action, which we are doing in Libya, where we do not have a single soldier on the ground, but are supporting allies in protecting the Libyan people and giving them the chance to determine their destiny.

In all that we do, we must remember that what sets America apart is not solely our power – it is the principles upon which our union was founded. We are a nation that brings our enemies to justice while adhering to the rule of law, and respecting the rights of all our citizens. We protect our own freedom and prosperity by extending it to others. We stand not for empire, but for self-determination. That is why we have a stake in the democratic aspirations that are now washing across the Arab World. We will support those revolutions with fidelity to our ideals, with the power of our example, and with an unwavering belief that all human beings deserve to live with freedom and dignity.

Above all, we are a nation whose strength abroad has been anchored in opportunity for our citizens at home. Over the last decade, we have spent a trillion dollars on war, at a time of rising debt and hard economic times. Now, we must invest in America’s greatest resource – our people. We must unleash innovation that creates new jobs and industry, while living within our means. We must rebuild our infrastructure and find new and clean sources of energy. And most of all, after a decade of passionate debate, we must recapture the common purpose that we shared at the beginning of this time of war. For our nation draws strength from our differences, and when our union is strong no hill is too steep and no horizon is beyond our reach.

America, it is time to focus on nation building here at home.

In this effort, we draw inspiration from our fellow Americans who have sacrificed so much on our behalf. To our troops, our veterans and their families, I speak for all Americans when I say that we will keep our sacred trust with you, and provide you with the care, and benefits, and opportunity that you deserve.
I met some of those patriotic Americans at Fort Campbell. A while back, I spoke to the 101st Airborne that has fought to turn the tide in Afghanistan, and to the team that took out Osama bin Laden. Standing in front of a model of bin Laden’s compound, the Navy SEAL who led that effort paid tribute to those who had been lost – brothers and sisters in arms whose names are now written on bases where our troops stand guard overseas, and on headstones in quiet corners of our country where their memory will never be forgotten. This officer - like so many others I have met with on bases, in Baghdad and Bagram, at Walter Reed and Bethesda Naval Hospital – spoke with humility about how his unit worked together as one – depending on each other, and trusting one another, as a family might do in a time of peril.

That’s a lesson worth remembering – that we are all a part of one American family. Though we have known disagreement and division, we are bound together by the creed that is written into our founding documents, and a conviction that the United States of America is a country that can achieve whatever it sets out to accomplish. Now, let us finish the work at hand. Let us responsibly end these wars, and reclaim the American Dream that is at the center of our story. With confidence in our cause; with faith in our fellow citizens; and with hope in our hearts, let us go about the work of extending the promise of America – for this generation, and the next. May God bless our troops. And may God bless the United States of America.

Monday, 16 April 2012

Kabul Attacks - Is Afghanistan Ready for its Own Security

Yesterday attacks on government installations in Kabul and across Afghanistan have left 36 insurgents and eight Afghan policemen dead.  The casualties also included 65 people injured.   The attacks, which the Taliban called the start of their spring offensive and retaliation for the Quran burnings, were also conducted in the provinces of Logar, Paktia and Nangarhar.

The focus of the attacks and the Taliban's seemingly changed strategy to move from the battlefield to an infiltration of government facilities is troubling.  The method has been used several times after the Quran burnings, on a smaller scale.  One or two gunmen had infiltrated Afghan Secuirity Forces and opened fire on their NATO mentors.  At least six British soldiers and seven Americans have been killed at the hands of those they were mentoring.  Two of the deaths occurred in the Afghan Ministry of the Interior.

The attack conducted over the weekend was at a much larger scale and by all accounts took all day to resolve.  It took a combined force of Afghan and Norwegian Special Forces to quell the insurgency at a construction site in  the central district of Wazir Akbar Khan.  While the operations were reportedly led by Afghan Forces, it is not clear how they would have fared on their own.

What is clear that some Afghans, including lawmaker Shukria Barakzai, are skeptical on how Afghan Security forces would deal with these situations on their own.  The attacks have shattered the confidence of those that felt that Kabul was a safe place.  Whatever the Taliban's aim was for these attacks, they have raised doubt as to the safety of the whole country. 

NATO continues to put a positive spin on the ongoing transition.  The Afghan security forces “were on scene immediately, well-led and well-coordinated. They integrated their efforts, helped protect their fellow citizens and largely kept the insurgents contained,” said General John Allen, commander in Afghanistan. 

The fact that the Taliban gained access to a secure area in Kabul has to be troubling from an intelligence point of view.  Fighting in urban areas is difficult, especially if you try to avoid colleteral damage. 

While it is hard to gauge whether or not Afghan Security Forces are ready to accept responsibility for their own security, it would be prudent to assess how they performed during this operation. 

Sunday, 15 April 2012

What About the Future of Afghanistan

Coordinated Attacks in Kabul and Across Eastern Afghanistan

On the heels of a G8 leaders conference, just a few days ago, the Taliban have claimed responsibility for at least five coordinated attacks in Kabul.  According to the Taliban the attack targeted NATO headquarters, the British and German Embassies, the Afghan parliament building, the Serena and Kabul Star hotels, and sites along Darulaman road, where the Russian Embassy is located.  Insurgents also targeted Afghan and NATO installations in the capital cities of Nangarhar, Logar and Paktia provinces.

"In all these attacks, tens of mujahedeen fighters equipped with light and heavy weapons, suicide vests, RPGs, rockets, heavy machine-guns and hand grenades are attacking their targets," Zabiullah Mujahid, a Taliban spokesman,  said in the email.


"Our initial reports indicate that a large number of foreign forces, Afghan police and army are killed and wounded."

Taliban casualty rates are often exaggerated and ISAF has confirmed to reporters that no NATO forces were killed.  

NATO's Plans for the Way Ahead in Afghanistan

While the number of NATO casualties this year so far have been significantly reduced, reaching a high of 711 in 2010 and 566 last year, there are still too many killed, with no apparent progress.  NATO insists that the transition is going well and that Afghan Security Forces are taking over the responsibility for their country's security.  Apparently security for Afghan government buildings in Kabul is being handled by Afghan Security forces.  

NATO's intend is to complete the transition to Afghan Security forces by the end of 2014, with a yet determined number of NATO forces remaining in Afghanistan.  The details are expected to be worked out in a NATO Afghanistan conference next month.  

G8 leaders were at a  meeting, chaired by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, to pledge their continued engagement in Afghanistan, for at least the next decade.  

"With the gradual transition to hand responsibility for Afghan security to the Karzai government, leaders of the G8 have reaffirmed their commitment for the long ranging engagement in Afghanistan.  The leaders reaffirmed their strong commitment to Afghanistan’s sovereignty and national unity.  They urged Afghan President Hamid Karzai to combat corruption and work on improving governance.

While NATO intends to handover security responsibilities to the war torn nation by 2014, the country obviously has several problems to overcome.  Afghan Security Forces need to be paid, just as infrastructure requires funding.  There will likely be some US/NATO troops left in Afghanistan, the scope and size, which is yet to be determined.  This will also require a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA)."
  Read More Here


The White House and  NATO, including General John Allen, ISAF Commander, continue on the message that progress is being made.  While the training numbers of Afghan forces may be met, the question still remains on how reliable these troops will be.  

Since the Qoran burnings and the massacre of 17 civilians by a US serviceman, the Taliban have cranked up their attacks.  There have been the so called "Green on Blue" attacks, where members of the Taliban have infiltrated Afghan Security Forces and killed NATO soldier, including two in the Interior Ministry.

Attempts to negotiate with the Taliban have not yielded any results.  How likely is it that the Afghan government will be able to secure the country?  It seems like a high order, since the Taliban want nothing less than rule Afghanistan.  Will the country revert to Taliban rule after NATO leaves?  This is difficult to answer, however in a tribal society, loyalty to Hamid Karzai has to be pretty thin.

Afghanistan doesn't have the title of "Graveyard of Empires" without reason. 


Friday, 13 April 2012

G8 Leaders Affirm Afghanistan Engagement

With the gradual transition to hand responsibility for Afghan security to the Karzai government, leaders of the G8 have reaffirmed their commitment for the long ranging engagement in Afghanistan.  The leaders reaffirmed their strong commitment to Afghanistan’s sovereignty and national unity.  They urged Afghan President Hamid Karzai to combat corruption and work on improving governance. 

While NATO intends to handover security responsibilities to the war torn nation by 2014, the country obviously has several problems to overcome.  Afghan Security Forces need to be paid, just as infrastructure requires funding.  There will likely be some US/NATO troops left in Afghanistan, the scope and size, which is yet to be determined.  This will also require a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA).  

Afghanistan is a tribal nation, which will make governing from the centre virtually impossible unless local warlords and tribal leaders support a central government. 

The meeting on Afghanistan, which was held at Blair House, chaired by Secretary of State Clinton.  The G8 leaders renewed their support for an Afghan-led reconciliation process and vowed to help strengthen Afghan forces.  A joint statement said:

“The ministers reaffirmed the agreement reached in Bonn for sustainable levels of financial support, consistent with the Kabul process, toward Afghanistan’s economic development and security-related costs as part of their enduring engagement with Afghanistan through 2014 and into the transformation decade (2015-2024).”

The statement acknowledged that significant progress had been made, however much more must be done on human rights, international terrorism, respect of the Afghan constitution and for the right of women.

 “Reconciliation must contain the reaffirmation of a sovereign, stable and united Afghanistan; the renunciation of violence; the breaking of ties to international terrorism; and the respect for the Afghan constitution, including its human rights provisions, notably the rights of women."

While G8 leaders acknowledged the traditions and religion of Afghanistan, they said that it must coincide with international human rights and obligations under humanitarian law.  They also urged the Afghan government to  enact reforms to address corruption, enhance the rule of law and foster a business and legal environment conducive to private investment.

This may be a high order for President Hamid Karzai, who has been accused of corruption and election fraud.  There is also still the issue on how to deal with the Taliban and the Pakistani government.  Unquestionably relations with Pakistan will be the key to failure or success of the Afghan mission. 

While there will be reduced costs for the military presence in Afghanistan, significant funds to prop up the government an economy will be needed for years to come, at least another decade.

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Ten Years in Afghanistan a UK Perspective


Operation Enduring Freedom was launched as a result of the attack on the World Trade Centre, were almost 3,000 innocent people were killed.  Al Quaeda, including its leader Osama Bin Laden, had found a safe haven in Afghanistan.  When the Taliban failed to hand over Al Quaeda terrorists, including its leaders, Operation Enduring Freedom was launched.

Sanctioned by the UN, a coalition of NATO countries and others launched an attack on Afghanistan and removed the Taliban, an oppressive regime from power.   A central government was installed, followed by elections.   Whether or not installing a central government in a tribal nation is open for debate.  Hindsight being 20/20 it may have been more appropriate to work with local governments and tribal leaders that would have been responsible for selecting a central government according to tribal tradition.

After a surge of 100,000 troops authorized by President Obama, the drawdown has begun.  NATO intends to remove all of its troops by 2014.  A big push is underway, with priority to ready Afghan Security Forces to be prepared to provide security for the Afghan people.  The jury is also out on this.

Canada ended its combat role in July and is now embarked on a training mission near Kabul.  158 Canadian soldiers have paid the ultimate price in Afghanistan.

The UK Armed Forces, who shared the lions share of the burden in the southern provinces of Kandahar and Helmand, have also lost 378 soldiers in the ten year war.

The UK Ministry of Defence has put together a video with footage over the past ten years, highlighting the history of operations and explaining the reason for the UK's involvement in the war.  The video shows the progress that has been made and the preparations leading up to the handover of control to Afghans in 2015.   

While NATO is preparing to withdraw from NATO, it appears that the leaders of NATO countries are also planning to have a continued presence in Afghanistan for continued training and mentoring of Afghan Security Forces. 

Below the UK Video 10 Years of Operations in Afghanistan:

.