Showing posts with label Afghanistan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Afghanistan. Show all posts

Saturday, 28 July 2012

DOD: US military casualties in Afghanistan as of July 27, 2012

With Syria in turmoil, the election campaign in full swing and the Olympics underway, twelve more US soldiers died in Afghanistan this week. Two more soldier were killed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. 86 US soldiers joined the list of wounded warriors.
News on the US economy continued to be disappointing with the Commerce Department reporting that the economy had slowed to a growth of 1.5%, while consumer confidence dropped to its lowest level in 2012. Consumer spending accounts for 70% of economic activity. Full Story @allvoices.com

Saturday, 30 June 2012

DOD US Military Casualties in Afghanistan as of 29 June 2012

 With the crisis in Syria, the uncertainty in Egypt and the Middle East overall, Afghanistan has once again been placed on the back burner of the national media.  Add to that the Affordable Health Care Act decision, the decision on the Arizona law and the 2012 election in  general it is easy to put Afghanistan out of mind. Nonetheless, 125 US soldiers have lost their lives in Afghanistan this year, 37 this month alone. 

Despite the crisis in the Eurozone, European countries have focused on the beautiful game, which has now progressed to a competition between two nations, Spain and Italy, to be decided in Kiev, Ukraine on Sunday.  Sports is s great diversion from the troubles of every day life, but it doesn't change the reality.  While European leaders may have bought themselves a little more time, the Eurozone troubles are far from being solved. 

In the U.S. no major decisions can be expected for the next six months, as both President Obama and Mitt Romney are in full election mode.  With insane amounts being spend on re-election, which should give pause to voters alone, no one is prepared to make the hard decisions that might put the economy on the right track.  A divided country deals with talking points on both sides, which do not reflect reality. 

While it's easy to forget our men and women in Afghanistan, with wildfires in Colorado and every day challenges of a heat wave all along the east coast, take a moment and remember the men and women in Afghanistan, Lest We Forget.


Roll of Casualties

Below are this week’s updated DoD casualty figures:

Op Enduring Freedom                  Total Deaths       KIA   Non Hostile              WIA

Afghanistan Only                                   1900               1577        323                     16584
Other Locations                                        114                   12        102
 DoD Civ Casualties                                     3                     1            2
Worldwide Total                                     2017               1590         427                    16584

Accumulated 2012 Casualties:

KIA            Non Combat Deaths             WIA

  125                            55                              956

Saturday, 2 June 2012

DOD US Military Casualties in Afghanistan as of 01 Jun 2012

 "The war in Afghanistan, as we know it, is over."  Those were the words of President Obama after the NATO summit last month.  Yet another 12 U.S. soldiers have been killed in action (KIA) and three died of presumably accidents, while at least 120 were wounded in action (WIA).  At least two UK soldiers and one other NATO soldier were also killed.

The relationship with Pakistan couldn't be worse after the arrest of Shakeel Afridi  on May 24th and sentencing to 33 years in jail under Pakistan's archaic system of tribal justice.  Publicly the United States has not placed much pressure on Pakistan other than Congress punishing Pakistan with a $33 Million cut to aid.  The punishment is a drop in the bucket.

The US continues with drone attacks into Pakistan, with everyone killed called a militant.  With the election campaign in the US in full swing, the media has concentrated on the trivial, like the so-called war on women by the GOP, Bain Capital performance to discredit Mitt Romney, who is now officially the GOP nominee to challenge President Obama.  Afghanistan, after the NATO summit in Chicago is off the radar again. 

Yesterday's job figures were again dismal, with only 69,000 jobs created, while 150,000 were expected.  The unemployment figure rose to 8.2%.  Many of those unemployed are veterans.  While last weekend, Memorial weekend, paid homage to those killed in America's wars, the reality is that they are out of sight and mind for the remainder of the year.

The situation in Syria has reached a critical point, with little agreement in the UN on how to deal with it.  Russia and China are at odds with Western powers on how to deal with the Assad regime.  Iran continues to be a thorn in the eye of the United States, with little chance of reaching an agreement to stop Iran's pursuit of a nuclear weapon.

France will have its combat troops out of Afghanistan by the end of the year, Australia will leave a year earlier, while Canada will not make any further commitments past March 2014.  The ten year war has been costly.  Whether or not the Karzai government can take over responsibility of Afghanistan remains to be seen.

While the war in Afghanistan, as we know it, is over, let's remember that it is not over for the thousands of NATO soldiers serving in the war torn nation.  Even one more dead soldier or civilian is too many.  Take a moment this week and remember that young soldiers are still dieing.  Lest We Forget.

Roll of Casualties

Below are this week’s updated DoD casualty figures:

Op Enduring Freedom                  Total Deaths       KIA   Non Hostile              WIA

Afghanistan Only                                   1872               1552        320                     16144
Other Locations                                        112                   12        100
 DoD Civ Casualties                                     3                     1            2
Worldwide Total                                     1987                1565        422                    16144

Accumulated 2012 Casualties:

KIA            Non Combat Deaths             WIA

 100                           52                               916

Saturday, 26 May 2012

DOD US Military Casualties in Afghanistan as of 25 May 2012

 Another six U.S. soldiers laid down their lives in Afghanistan this week, while 74 others were wounded in action.  Overal 137 young Americans have been killed in Afghanistan this year and another 796 wounded. 

 Last weekend's NATO summit, which primarily dealt with an exit strategy from Afghanistan, concluded that NATO troops would be out of Afghanistan by 2014 and that Afghan Security Forces would take the lead for operations against the Taliban by the middle of next year.  "The war in Afghanistan, as we know it, as we know it, is over."  Those were the words of President Obama at the conclusion of last week's NATO summit. 

The summit also dealt with the funding of Afghan Forces, which is expected to cost $4.2 Billion annually, with a NATO commitment for the next decade.  France's new President was steadfast that French soldier will leave Afghanistan by the end of this year.  Australia will depart a year earlier than anticipated, while Canada has announced that no Canadian troops would remain in Afghanistan, including a training role, beyond March 2013. 

Yes, the politicians have declared the war over and can't get to the exit fast enough.  Politicians and senior NATO commanders are reassuring the public that the Afghan National Army, expected to be at a strength of 352,000 by 2014 will be able to handle the task.  The rank and file is not so confident.  The ANA has high absenteeism, rampant drug use and of course is being infiltrated by the insurgents. 

At this stage it is not known how many NATO countries will remain in Afghanistan post 2014.  What is clear though, is that Afghanistan will require the support of NATO if it is to succeed, both in funding of its large security force and military support in the form of air support and drones. 

There is a "Strategic Partnership Agreement", but little detail has been released of its contents.

It would appear that gone is the concept, which based any withdrawal on the conditions on the ground.  The preparations are full speed ahead to facilitate the NATO withdrawal. Since Pakistan is key in success, there is little going well in the relations between Pakistan and the U.S. and NATO. 

Yes, the war in Afghanistan, as we know it, is over.  What has not been explained is what that means.  Suffice to say that U.S. and NATO soldiers are still dieing.  Lest We Forget.

Roll of Casualties

Below are this week’s updated DoD casualty figures:

Op Enduring Freedom                  Total Deaths       KIA   Non Hostile              WIA

Afghanistan Only                                   1857               1540        317                     15024
Other Locations                                        113                   12        101
 DoD Civ Casualties                                     3                     1            2
Worldwide Total                                     1973               1553        420                    16024

Accumulated 2012 Casualties:

KIA            Non Combat Deaths             WIA

  88                            49                               796

Monday, 21 May 2012

Canada Will Withdraw All Troops at the end of 2014

Canada has decided that handing over responsibility for Afghanistan to Afghan Security Forces means just that.  Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced, as the NATO Summit wound up, that Canada would withdraw all of its troops by the end of 2014. 

The Prime Minister said that withdrawing the troops was not abandoning the war torn country, but a transfer of responsibility to the Afghan people.  While no Canadian troops will remain in Afghanistan, Harper said that Canada would continue to support the Afghan Army by pledging $110 Million for the next three years.

Canada had been asked earlier by the United States and NATO to extend its present training contingent.  There has also been discussion as to maintaining Joint Task Forces 2 special operations troops in Afghanistan.  While the Prime Minister did not address JTF 2, it is clear that the 950 strong contingent of trainers will be coming home at the end of 2014.

NATO issued a declaration overnight stating that it would responsibly draw down its combat troops by December 31st, 2014.

"We are gradually and responsibly drawing down our forces to complete the ISAF mission by 31 December 2014. By the end of 2014, when the Afghan Authorities will have full security responsibility, the NATO-led combat mission will end."

 The United Kingdom had 414 of its soldiers killed in action, Canada 158, France 82, Germany 53, Italy 46, Denmark 42, Poland 35, Spain 34 and Australia 32, just to name a few.  Overall 3006 NATO soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan.  Add to that those wounded and psychologically damaged, one must ask the question if the cost was worth it.  Read More here 

President Obama announced that US troops would end their combat mission by mid 2013 and during a press conference with Afghan President Hamid Karzai announced that the war in Afghanistan, as we know it, has ended.

During the NATO summit it became clear that all 28 NATO leaders were looking for a way out of the war torn country and that the leaders have recognized that the war is at a stalemate.  You won't, of course, not hear any of the leaders say this.  According to them there has been enough progress that assures that Afghan Security forces can take over and keep the Taliban at bay.

According to the NATO leaders, the Afghan Forces will be in a position to take on much of that role next year, permitting the exit of NATO combat forces.  NATO, however is committed to support and training of Afghan forces.  The bill is estimated to be $4.2 Billion a year.

Canada has been in Afghanistan since 2002 and ended its combat mission in July of 2011, but maintained a contingent of 950 trainers, with a commitment to 2014.  Prime Minister Stephen Harper believes that Canada has carried enough of the load in Afghanistan.  158 Canadian soldier lost their life.  If the trainers leave in 2014, Canada will have done that mission for three years. 

One can only hope that no more Canadians die on that mission.  

 

NATO Summit - Afghanistan - Rush to the Exit

When President Obama took office, almost three and a half years ago, he said that Afghanistan was the justified war, while he said he would end the war in Iraq.  One can argue about how the war in Iraq was ended and whether or not it created more security problems in the region, but as far as Afghanistan is concerned, there now appears to be a rush to the exit.  There seems to be no regard for the conditions on the ground.

France will have its troops out of Afghanistan by the end of this year.  Australia has already announced that it will leave a year early and the Canadian government has indicated that it has done more than its fair share and will not extend its training mission beyond 2014.

President Obama said yesterday that the war in Afghanistan is over as we know it.  Really?  1965 US soldiers have paid the ultimate price as of last Friday Read More, including just six last week.

NATO issued a declaration on Afghanistan overnight.

 "We are gradually and responsibly drawing down our forces to complete the ISAF mission by 31 December 2014. By the end of 2014, when the Afghan Authorities will have full security responsibility, the NATO-led combat mission will end."

The United Kingdom had 414 of its soldiers killed in action, Canada 158, France 82, Germany 53, Italy 46, Denmark 42, Poland 35, Spain 34 and Australia 32, just to name a few.  Overall 3006 NATO soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan.  Add to that those wounded and psychologically damaged, one must ask the question if the cost was worth it.

The Taliban is hardly defeated, despite the positive spin that the President is trying to put on the war.  The Karzai government is corrupt and yet it is the best partner NATO has in the devastated region.  It is anticipated that $4.2 Billion is required to fund Afghanistan's military post the NATO withdrawal, of which the US is expected to pay about half.

Let's be clear, the decisions being taken in regards to the NATO mission have nothing to do with the conditions on the ground but are merely being taken for political expediency.  It is no accident that those decisions are being announced during the President's re-election campaign.  They are all part of a check list for improving re-election efforts.

While the public is tired of war, more respect should be shown for the price that soldiers and their families have paid.  While most of them are volunteers, none of them asked to go to Afghanistan.  It is  not the soldier that starts wars. It is the politician.  Now the politician is turning his/her very back  on those they tasked to fight their war.  

At the very least politicians could be honest with the public and show respect for the soldiers, many way too young to realize what they are getting themselves into.

This travesty is amplified upon the soldiers return. The soldier has to fight for proper care and in most instances is unable to find employment.  Not only is the politician to blame, but also the media that has not done enough to highlight the plight of veterans. Does this look like Vietnam all over again?

Saturday, 19 May 2012

DOD US Military Casualties in Afghanistan as of 18 May 2012

With the NATO and G8 Summits underway in Camp David and the windy city underway this weekend, another six U.S. soldiers have paid the ultimate price in Afghanistan.  High on the priority this weekend will be the future of Afghanistan and the recently signed Strategic Partnership Agreement on Afghanistan.

France's new socialist President Francois Hollande has given notice that French troops will depart Afghanistan by the end of 2012.  There may be some flexibility to leave a contingent of French troops to help train Afghan Security Forces.  Training an maintaining Afghanistan's forces is expected to cost $4.2 Billion, of which the United States is expected to cover $2Billion.

Also high on the G8 agenda will be the global economy, especially with the emphasis on Greece and its inability to form a government that can agree on much of anything.  France rejected Nicolas Sarkozy, who was of common mind with Germany's Angela Merkel, electing a socialist, who wants less authority and more emphasis on growth with stimulus.  It is no surprise that Hollande's first visit was to Berlin to visit the German chancellor.

Hollande also had a meeting with President Obama ahead of the Summit, where Afghanistan and the Eurozone debt crisis were discussed.  President Obama and President Hollande, who both advocate stimulus, will likely pressure their more conservative counterparts, David Cameron of the UK, Angela Merkel of Germany and Stephen Harper of Canada to support more stimulus.  Although the leaders will end up with a non-committal joint communique, there will be some friction involving the two opposing views. 

The United States has its own problems with the debt ceiling approaching $16 Trillion and is facing another fight in Congress to raise the debt ceiling.  The summit, which should have been a positive in an election year, with the news of an orderly withdrawal and and end of he war in Afghanistan, has the potential to be a detractor for President Obama's bid for re-election.  The summit results will be managed with kid gloves.

On the good news front and perhaps a plus for U.S./Chinese relations, Chen Guangchen has left a Chinese hospital and is apparently on his way back to the United States later on today.  He is in the process of getting a valid passport, which his wife and children have already been issued with. 

The Afghanistan war is often skipped over by the main stream media, after all there is so much election 2012 fodder, ranging from Mitt Romney's alleged bullying 50 years ago, President Obama's association with Reverend Wright, all issues that don't deal with the real problems in the United States or the globe. 

The sooner the media deals with the U.S. and global economic problems, concentrates on the way forward in Afghanistan and issues like Syria, Iran, North Korea and the Middle East, the sooner there might be solutions to solve the world's problems.  Petty trash around on the sidelines does not deserve time and it shows disrespect to the soldiers that have so valiantly given their lives in a far away country.

Let's not forget that those soldiers are still confronting the enemy daily and take some time to think of their sacrifice.  Lest We Forget.

Roll of Casualties

Below are this week’s updated DoD casualty figures:

Op Enduring Freedom                  Total Deaths       KIA   Non Hostile              WIA

Afghanistan Only                                   1851               1534        317                     15950
Other Locations                                        111                   12          99
DoD Civ Casualties                                      3                     1            2
Worldwide Total                                     1965               1547        418                    15950

Accumulated 2012 Casualties:

KIA            Non Combat Deaths             WIA

  82                            49                               722

Saturday, 12 May 2012

DOD US Military Casualties in Afghanistan as of 11 May 2012

As the American election campaign takes up steam, another ten US soldiers paid the ultimate price in Afghanistan during the past week. Nine died of combat related deaths, while one death was of other causes.  72 soldiers were wounded.   This brings the total number of deaths this year to 125 with  680 wounded soldiers.

While the U.S. media concentrated on the campaign, President Obama went on fundraisers, one of them at George Clooney's residence in California that raised $15 Million for the President, Afghanistan continues to be a volatile place.  

Meanwhile Greece is still struggling with forming a government, France has a new President, which has promised growth rather than austerity measures.   The UK had a 24 hour public sector strike, protesting David Cameron's austerity measures, which involve raising the pension age and asking that public sector employees to contribute more to their pensions.

The U.S. is approaching a $16 Trillion deficit, the economy is sluggish at best and millions of Americans remain unemployed.  The election campaign has turned to name calling, digging up dirt on irrelevant events that happened in the 60s. 

This week President Obama announced that he was in favour of gay marriage, a position he has flip flopped on several  times, dating back to at least 1996. 

Obama's Evolution:
1996 - To the Chicago LBGT newspaper - "I favor legalizing same-sex marriages, and would fight efforts to prohibit such marriages.”
2004 - "I don't think Marriage is a Civil Right" - See Video
2008 - At Saddleback Church  he said hat he believed marriage is a union of one man and one woman.
2012 - He says in an interview with ABC that he personally supports gay marriage, but would leave it to states to decide.    

“At a certain point I’ve just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same sex couples should be able to get married,” Obama said in an interview with ABC’s Robin Roberts.

The announcement came on the heels of North Carolina's electorate voting  with 60%  against gay marriage.

Vladimir Putin is once again the Captain of the ship in Russia and has scuttled his invitation to attend the G8 Summit in Camp David, stating that he had to work on selecting his Cabinet.  There is widespread belief though, that Putin is skipping the summit to protest NATO's intention to instal the missile defence stystem.   Russia's Foreign Minister has said that the Russia would station rockets close to the Polish border and if necessary destroy the infrastructure of the missile defense system.

There are less than six months before the U.S. election.   Many issues need to be resolved, including the future of Europe, Afghanistan and the U.S. and global economy.  Iran, North Korea, Syria and the Palestinian/Israel issues are still very much unsolved.  Meanwhile the pettiness in the U.S. election campaign continues, without the most important global and domestic issues being addressed.  Instead social issues seem to be front and centre, issues that should have or have been resolved decades ago.  Instead both sides try to get votes with soundbytes. 

While soldiers continue to die and are burdened with disabilities, neither side is engaging in a serious debate about the future of America.  It's time to let the rubber hit the road, get into the serious issues, present a vision for the future of America and the world.   Take a moment this week to think about the men and women who are still fighting a nasty battle in Afghanistan.  They deserve our support, Lest We Forget.

Roll of Casualties

Below are this week’s updated DoD casualty figures:

Op Enduring Freedom                  Total Deaths       KIA   Non Hostile              WIA

Afghanistan Only                                   1845               1529        316                     15858
Other Locations                                        111                   12          99
DoD Civ Casualties                                      3                     1            2
Worldwide Total                                     1959                1542        417                    15858

Accumulated 2012 Casualties:

KIA            Non Combat Deaths             WIA

  77                            48                               680

Monday, 7 May 2012

Afghanistan - Mission Accomplished or Not

President Obama had his "Mission Accomplished" moment on the first anniversary of Osama Bin Laden's capture and death.  He secretly traveled to Afghanistan, met with troops, then went to Kabul to sign the Strategic Partnership Agreement with President Hamid Karzai.

Prior to his trip to Afghanistan, the Obama camp put out an ad that touted Obama's success in killing Bin Laden, dubbed over with the comments of former President Bill Clinton, all but made Obama the hero and risk taker, while inferring that his Republican challenger, Mitt Romney, would have reached a different decision.  Veterans groups were appalled releasing their own ad, which basically praised the brave men and women of Navy Seal Team six and the intelligence community with the slogan "Heroes don't brag." 

In his prime time address to the American people from Kabul, President Obama said in part:

"Tonight, I can tell you that we are fulfilling that commitment. Thanks to our men and women in uniform, our civilian personnel, and our many coalition partners, we are meeting our goals. As a result, starting next month, we will be able to remove 10,000 of our troops from Afghanistan by the end of this year, and we will bring home a total of 33,000 troops by next summer, fully recovering the surge I announced at West Point. After this initial reduction, our troops will continue coming home at a steady pace as Afghan Security forces move into the lead. Our mission will change from combat to support. By 2014, this process of transition will be complete, and the Afghan people will be responsible for their own security.

We are starting this drawdown from a position of strength. Al Qaeda is under more pressure than at any time since 9/11. Together with the Pakistanis, we have taken out more than half of al Qaeda’s leadership. And thanks to our intelligence professionals and Special Forces, we killed Osama bin Laden, the only leader that al Qaeda had ever known. This was a victory for all who have served since 9/11. One soldier summed it up well. “The message,” he said, “is we don’t forget. You will be held accountable, no matter how long it takes.”

The information that we recovered from bin Laden’s compound shows al Qaeda under enormous strain. Bin Laden expressed concern that al Qaeda has been unable to effectively replace senior terrorists that have been killed, and that al Qaeda has failed in its effort to portray America as a nation at war with Islam – thereby draining more widespread support. Al Qaeda remains dangerous, and we must be vigilant against attacks. But we have put al Qaeda on a path to defeat, and we will not relent until the job is done.


In Afghanistan, we’ve inflicted serious losses on the Taliban and taken a number of its strongholds. Along with our surge, our allies also increased their commitments, which helped stabilize more of the country. Afghan Security Forces have grown by over 100,000 troops, and in some provinces and municipalities we have already begun to transition responsibility for security to the Afghan people. In the face of violence and intimidation, Afghans are fighting and dying for their country, establishing local police forces, opening markets and schools, creating new opportunities for women and girls, and trying to turn the page on decades of war."


Just two hours after the President's departure from Afghanistan, insurgents attacked a compound that houses foreigners in Kabul, demonstrating that the security in Afghanistan is not exactly what some in the NATO governing elite would like us to believe.

While the ability of Afghan Security Forces are being touted and praised by some.  In some military circles that ability and the commitment of those forces is being questioned.  The Taliban has been able to infiltrate security forces and there have been a number of incidents, which are known as green on blue fire that have killed NATO troops.  The most recent incident was on Sunday, when a Marine was shot dead and another wounded before returning fire killed the attacker.

Nearly 20 such attacks have occurred so far this year, including one in the Afghan Interior Ministry, which killed two NATO officers, leading to the death of 12 soldiers so far this year.  This has led to mistrust between NATO and the Afghans they are training.

The U.S. is also considering abandoning plans  for a consulate in the country's north because the building chosen was deemed too dangerous to occupy.  $80 million has been spend on the project despite  security deficiencies, according to a copy of a document drafted by the U.S. Embassy in Kabul.

The heads of the House and Senate Intelligence Committee, Senator Diane Feinstein (D) and Representative Mike Rogers (R-MI) appeared on CNN's "State of the Union" yesterday and claimed that the Taliban is gaining ground in Afghanistan.

 “I think we'd both say that what we found is that the Taliban is stronger.  Karzai believes that the Taliban will not come back. I'm not so sure. The Taliban has a shadow system of governors in many provinces. They've gone up north. They've gone to the east. Attacks are up.”said Feinstein.

Representative Mike Rogers agreed with her and elaborated on additional reasons that demonstrate for what he considered the  Taliban's increasing strength.

 “This is a huge problem. And what we have found is maybe the policies, the announced date of withdrawal, the negotiations with the Taliban, have worked against what our endgame is here.  we ought to have a hard discussion about saying, listen, war is when one side wins and one side loses.”

NATO leaders have been determined to get out of Afghanistan as quickly as possible, mostly due to  pressure of a war weary public.  A CBS report yesterday revealed that there has been a U.S. program for several years, which released high level insurgents from  U.S.-run Parwan detention facility near Bagram north of Kabul.  The CBS report reads:

"As the United States has unsuccessfully pursued a peace deal with the Taliban, the “strategic release” program has quietly served as a live diplomatic channel, allowing American officials to use prisoners as bargaining chips in restive provinces where military power has reached its limits."

Releasing prisoners from Guantanamo requires congressional approval, while it does not from Bagram.  Enough said.

Add to that the revelation made by the former Vice Chief of the Army, General Jack Keane, which reveals that the President knew about the location of Bin Laden as early as the Summer of 2010, the Mission Accomplished moment has to be questioned.

What seems to be the facts on the ground, is not necessarily what is told the public in NATO capitals or Washington.   Almost 2000 American troops have died in Afghanistan and are still dieing.  Add to that almost 16,000 wounded and it is not hard to tell that the sacrifice of American blood has been significant.

Afghanistan has not been called the "Graveyard of Empires" for nothing.  This mission is far from accomplished and one has to agree that we ought to have a hard discussion on this war.  Either get serious about winning or get out.  Enough of the rhetoric.





Friday, 4 May 2012

Two British Soldiers Killed in Southern Afghanistan

The UK Ministry of Defence reports that two more British soldiers were killed in Southern Afghanistan.  According to the report the soldiers, both members of the Royal Logistcs Corps, serving with the 1st Battalion Royal Welsh Battle Group, were killed in an direct attack on a forward operating base (FOB).

Spokesman for Task Force Helmand, Major Ian Lawrence, said:
"Sadly, I must report that today two soldiers from the Royal Logistic Corps, attached to 1st Battalion The Royal Welsh Battlegroup, were killed in an indirect fire attack on their base.
"The thoughts and condolences of everyone serving in the Combined Force are with their families and friends."
The soldiers' families have been informed and have asked for a period of grace before further details are released.

The International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) had reported earlier that two NATO soldiers had died following an insurgent attack in southern Afghanistan.  The statement did not identify nationalities, which is normally deferred to the relevant national authorities.

Since the beginning of 2012, 142 NATO service members including 94 US troops, 16 British troops and 32 soldiers from other countries have been killed.  This brings the death toll for British troops up to 412 since deployment to Afghanistan.

Wednesday, 2 May 2012

Two Hours After Obama's Afghanistan Speech Taliban Strike Back

 Less than two hours after President Obama made his Afghanistan, the Taliban have struck back, attacking a foreigners housing compound in Kabul with a suicide car bomb.  The suicide bomber was accompanied by insurgents dressed as women. At least seven people were killed in the attack.

The compound, known as Green Village, houses hundreds of foreign contractors, diplomats and foreign aid workers.  It is located in East Kabul.  While the exterior fence was penetrated the suicide bomber, with two  attackers, were unable to penetrate the interior security fence.  Gun fire and explosions could be heard for hours as Security forces responded. 

Despite the claims made by President Obama in yesterday's speech, the Taliban have demonstrated with two major attacks in less than three weeks that they are still capable of striking the heart of the Afghan capital.  The capital is already heavily guarded and must have had extra security for President Obama's visit.

President Obama during his speech yesterday said:

"We are starting this drawdown from a position of strength. Al Qaeda is under more pressure than at any time since 9/11. Together with the Pakistanis, we have taken out more than half of al Qaeda’s leadership. And thanks to our intelligence professionals and Special Forces, we killed Osama bin Laden, the only leader that al Qaeda had ever known. This was a victory for all who have served since 9/11. One soldier summed it up well. “The message,” he said, “is we don’t forget. You will be held accountable, no matter how long it takes.”

The information that we recovered from bin Laden’s compound shows al Qaeda under enormous strain. Bin Laden expressed concern that al Qaeda has been unable to effectively replace senior terrorists that have been killed, and that al Qaeda has failed in its effort to portray America as a nation at war with Islam – thereby draining more widespread support. Al Qaeda remains dangerous, and we must be vigilant against attacks. But we have put al Qaeda on a path to defeat, and we will not relent until the job is done.


In Afghanistan, we’ve inflicted serious losses on the Taliban and taken a number of its strongholds. Along with our surge, our allies also increased their commitments, which helped stabilize more of the country. Afghan Security Forces have grown by over 100,000 troops, and in some provinces and municipalities we have already begun to transition responsibility for security to the Afghan people. In the face of violence and intimidation, Afghans are fighting and dying for their country, establishing local police forces, opening markets and schools, creating new opportunities for women and girls, and trying to turn the page on decades of war."


Taliban spokesman  Zabiullah Mujahid claimed responsibility for the attack, stating that it was a message to Obama that those that have signed the Strategic Partnership Agreement are not Afghans.

 "This was a message to Obama that those are not real Afghans that are signing documents about this country.  The real Afghan nation are those people that are not letting foreign invaders stay in this country or disrespect the dignity of our country."

While Mujahid said that the target was a foreign military base, an ISAF spokesman, Captain  Justin Brockhoff said that no NATO bases came under attack. 

Among military circles some concern has been raised as to the ability of Afghan Security Forces to take over responsibility for the security of Afghanistan.  This is due to apparent drug use, defections and absenteeism.  The Taliban has also been successful in infiltrating Security Forces. 

The Taliban, after the attack three weeks ago, warned that their spring offensive, code-named "Al-Farouk," had started. 

President Hamid Karzai condemned the attack, calling the militants "the slaves of foreigners who don't want Afghan children to learn."

The U.S. is expected to draw down 30,000 troops by  the end of the year and the UK will reduce its contingent by 500.  Australia has announced that its troops will leave Afghanistan by the end of next year.

It is not known how many troops will remain in Afghanistan after 2014.   The cost of the Strategic Partnership Agreement is expected to be $4.2 Billion of which the U.S. has apparently committed to fund at least half.  

Tuesday, 1 May 2012

President Obama's Afghanistan Speech 1 May 2012

On the anniversary of Osama Bin Laden's death, President Obama traveled to Afghanistan to sign a "Strategic Partnership Agreement."  The agreement clears the way for U.S. an NATO withdrawal in 2014.  After the official signing of the treaty, President Obama addressed both the Afghan and American people. 



Full Text of the President's Speech:

Remarks of President Barack Obama – As Prepared for Delivery
On the Way Forward in Afghanistan
Washington, D.C.
June 22, 2011
Good evening. Nearly ten years ago, America suffered the worst attack on our shores since Pearl Harbor. This mass murder was planned by Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda network in Afghanistan, and signaled a new threat to our security – one in which the targets were no longer soldiers on a battlefield, but innocent men, women and children going about their daily lives.

In the days that followed, our nation was united as we struck at al Qaeda and routed the Taliban in Afghanistan. Then, our focus shifted. A second war was launched in Iraq, and we spent enormous blood and treasure to support a new government there. By the time I took office, the war in Afghanistan had entered its seventh year. But al Qaeda’s leaders had escaped into Pakistan and were plotting new attacks, while the Taliban had regrouped and gone on the offensive. Without a new strategy and decisive action, our military commanders warned that we could face a resurgent al Qaeda, and a Taliban taking over large parts of Afghanistan.

For this reason, in one of the most difficult decisions that I’ve made as President, I ordered an additional 30,000 American troops into Afghanistan. When I announced this surge at West Point, we set clear objectives: to refocus on al Qaeda; reverse the Taliban’s momentum; and train Afghan Security Forces to defend their own country. I also made it clear that our commitment would not be open-ended, and that we would begin to drawdown our forces this July.

Tonight, I can tell you that we are fulfilling that commitment. Thanks to our men and women in uniform, our civilian personnel, and our many coalition partners, we are meeting our goals. As a result, starting next month, we will be able to remove 10,000 of our troops from Afghanistan by the end of this year, and we will bring home a total of 33,000 troops by next summer, fully recovering the surge I announced at West Point. After this initial reduction, our troops will continue coming home at a steady pace as Afghan Security forces move into the lead. Our mission will change from combat to support. By 2014, this process of transition will be complete, and the Afghan people will be responsible for their own security.

We are starting this drawdown from a position of strength. Al Qaeda is under more pressure than at any time since 9/11. Together with the Pakistanis, we have taken out more than half of al Qaeda’s leadership. And thanks to our intelligence professionals and Special Forces, we killed Osama bin Laden, the only leader that al Qaeda had ever known. This was a victory for all who have served since 9/11. One soldier summed it up well. “The message,” he said, “is we don’t forget. You will be held accountable, no matter how long it takes.”

The information that we recovered from bin Laden’s compound shows al Qaeda under enormous strain. Bin Laden expressed concern that al Qaeda has been unable to effectively replace senior terrorists that have been killed, and that al Qaeda has failed in its effort to portray America as a nation at war with Islam – thereby draining more widespread support. Al Qaeda remains dangerous, and we must be vigilant against attacks. But we have put al Qaeda on a path to defeat, and we will not relent until the job is done.

In Afghanistan, we’ve inflicted serious losses on the Taliban and taken a number of its strongholds. Along with our surge, our allies also increased their commitments, which helped stabilize more of the country. Afghan Security Forces have grown by over 100,000 troops, and in some provinces and municipalities we have already begun to transition responsibility for security to the Afghan people. In the face of violence and intimidation, Afghans are fighting and dying for their country, establishing local police forces, opening markets and schools, creating new opportunities for women and girls, and trying to turn the page on decades of war.

Of course, huge challenges remain. This is the beginning – but not the end – of our effort to wind down this war. We will have to do the hard work of keeping the gains that we have made, while we drawdown our forces and transition responsibility for security to the Afghan government. And next May, in Chicago, we will host a summit with our NATO allies and partners to shape the next phase of this transition.

We do know that peace cannot come to a land that has known so much war without a political settlement. So as we strengthen the Afghan government and Security Forces, America will join initiatives that reconcile the Afghan people, including the Taliban. Our position on these talks is clear: they must be led by the Afghan government, and those who want to be a part of a peaceful Afghanistan must break from al Qaeda, abandon violence, and abide by the Afghan Constitution. But, in part because of our military effort, we have reason to believe that progress can be made.
The goal that we seek is achievable, and can be expressed simply: no safe-haven from which al Qaeda or its affiliates can launch attacks against our homeland, or our allies. We will not try to make Afghanistan a perfect place. We will not police its streets or patrol its mountains indefinitely. That is the responsibility of the Afghan government, which must step up its ability to protect its people; and move from an economy shaped by war to one that can sustain a lasting peace. What we can do, and will do, is build a partnership with the Afghan people that endures – one that ensures that we will be able to continue targeting terrorists and supporting a sovereign Afghan government.

Of course, our efforts must also address terrorist safe-havens in Pakistan. No country is more endangered by the presence of violent extremists, which is why we will continue to press Pakistan to expand its participation in securing a more peaceful future for this war-torn region. We will work with the Pakistani government to root out the cancer of violent extremism, and we will insist that it keep its commitments. For there should be no doubt that so long as I am President, the United States will never tolerate a safe-haven for those who aim to kill us: they cannot elude us, nor escape the justice they deserve.

My fellow Americans, this has been a difficult decade for our country. We have learned anew the profound cost of war -- a cost that has been paid by the nearly 4500 Americans who have given their lives in Iraq, and the over 1500 who have done so in Afghanistan – men and women who will not live to enjoy the freedom that they defended. Thousands more have been wounded. Some have lost limbs on the field of battle, and others still battle the demons that have followed them home.
Yet tonight, we take comfort in knowing that the tide of war is receding. Fewer of our sons and daughters are serving in harm’s way. We have ended our combat mission in Iraq, with 100,000 American troops already out of that country. And even as there will be dark days ahead in Afghanistan, the light of a secure peace can be seen in the distance. These long wars will come to a responsible end.

As they do, we must learn their lessons. Already this decade of war has caused many to question the nature of America’s engagement around the world. Some would have America retreat from our responsibility as an anchor of global security, and embrace an isolation that ignores the very real threats that we face. Others would have America over-extend ourselves, confronting every evil that can be found abroad.

We must chart a more centered course. Like generations before, we must embrace America’s singular role in the course of human events. But we must be as pragmatic as we are passionate; as strategic as we are resolute. When threatened, we must respond with force – but when that force can be targeted, we need not deploy large armies overseas. When innocents are being slaughtered and global security endangered, we don’t have to choose between standing idly by or acting on our own. Instead, we must rally international action, which we are doing in Libya, where we do not have a single soldier on the ground, but are supporting allies in protecting the Libyan people and giving them the chance to determine their destiny.

In all that we do, we must remember that what sets America apart is not solely our power – it is the principles upon which our union was founded. We are a nation that brings our enemies to justice while adhering to the rule of law, and respecting the rights of all our citizens. We protect our own freedom and prosperity by extending it to others. We stand not for empire, but for self-determination. That is why we have a stake in the democratic aspirations that are now washing across the Arab World. We will support those revolutions with fidelity to our ideals, with the power of our example, and with an unwavering belief that all human beings deserve to live with freedom and dignity.

Above all, we are a nation whose strength abroad has been anchored in opportunity for our citizens at home. Over the last decade, we have spent a trillion dollars on war, at a time of rising debt and hard economic times. Now, we must invest in America’s greatest resource – our people. We must unleash innovation that creates new jobs and industry, while living within our means. We must rebuild our infrastructure and find new and clean sources of energy. And most of all, after a decade of passionate debate, we must recapture the common purpose that we shared at the beginning of this time of war. For our nation draws strength from our differences, and when our union is strong no hill is too steep and no horizon is beyond our reach.

America, it is time to focus on nation building here at home.

In this effort, we draw inspiration from our fellow Americans who have sacrificed so much on our behalf. To our troops, our veterans and their families, I speak for all Americans when I say that we will keep our sacred trust with you, and provide you with the care, and benefits, and opportunity that you deserve.
I met some of those patriotic Americans at Fort Campbell. A while back, I spoke to the 101st Airborne that has fought to turn the tide in Afghanistan, and to the team that took out Osama bin Laden. Standing in front of a model of bin Laden’s compound, the Navy SEAL who led that effort paid tribute to those who had been lost – brothers and sisters in arms whose names are now written on bases where our troops stand guard overseas, and on headstones in quiet corners of our country where their memory will never be forgotten. This officer - like so many others I have met with on bases, in Baghdad and Bagram, at Walter Reed and Bethesda Naval Hospital – spoke with humility about how his unit worked together as one – depending on each other, and trusting one another, as a family might do in a time of peril.

That’s a lesson worth remembering – that we are all a part of one American family. Though we have known disagreement and division, we are bound together by the creed that is written into our founding documents, and a conviction that the United States of America is a country that can achieve whatever it sets out to accomplish. Now, let us finish the work at hand. Let us responsibly end these wars, and reclaim the American Dream that is at the center of our story. With confidence in our cause; with faith in our fellow citizens; and with hope in our hearts, let us go about the work of extending the promise of America – for this generation, and the next. May God bless our troops. And may God bless the United States of America.

Obama Visit to Afghanistan on Bin Laden Death Anniversary

 President Obama arrived unannounced under the cover of darkness at Bagram Airbase, south of Kabul at 10:30pm local time.  He boarded a helicopter, which took him t Kabul, the Afghan capital.

The visit happens to coincide with the first anniversary of the death of Osama Bin Laden, but officials said that the visit was purely coincidental and was driven by the "Strategic Partnership Agreement, which had been negotiated approximately 20 months with officials.  President Obama is expected to address the American people at 7:30 pm Eastern Time.  He is expected to mention the death of Osama bin Laden in this evening's speech.

The President has been criticized for politicizing the Bin Laden death, especially after an attack ad was released that seemed to suggest that the President's Republican opponent would not have made that decision.  Vice President Biden made a similar comment.

The Strategic Partnership Agreement was finalized on April 22nd after 20 months of negotiations and discussions with NATO allies.

The Treaty, which deals with the residual U.S. force after withdrawal, the training and maintenance of Afghan Security Forces was in danger of collapsing based on the funding guarantee given by the U.S.  Earlier this week, Afghan President Hamid Karzai had demanded that the U.S commit in writing to at least $2Billion out of the estimated $4.2 Billion needed to fund Afghanistan.

While Afghan forces are expected to level at 228,500 by 2017, they are expected to grow to 352,000 soldiers and police officers this year, but the future size is under discussion.  A force of this size has to be funded, trained, equipped and paid.  The price tag for the force is approximately $4.1 Billion, of which the United States is expected to pay $2.3 Billion.  The remainder is to be split among NATO allies and the Afghan government. 

U.S. officials told reporters that the objective was to sign the agreement on Afghan soil. It has five  components: transition, training, partnership, reconciliation and rebuilding.  The emphasized the point that the U.S. learned the lesson of 1989 and will not abandon Afghanistan. 

The agreement was signed in the atrium of the King's Residence, which is part of the Presidential Palace. 

President Obam said that the U.S. and Afghanistan will be long term partners in combating terrorism and in training Afghan security partners.  He said that Afghanistan has a friend and partner in the U.S. and that together we'll achieve the goal of destroying Al Qaeda. 

The signing of this agreement clears the way for the exit of NATO from Afghanistan.  Australia will remove its contingent of 500 troops by 2013, Britain is withdrawing 500 troop, while the U.S. is expected to draw down 30,000 troops by the end of the year.

The details of the agreement have not yet been announced, including the residual NATO forces.  Both Canada and Australia have received a request from the U.S. to keep a small contingent of forces in Afghanistan to assist with training and pushing back the Taliban.

Canadian Forces Suicide Numbers Rise in 2011

The Canadian Forces reported that 19 men and one woman had committed suicide during 2011.  The number, although higher than the previous year, 12, is still well below the national average.

Canadian Forces have been deployed to Afghanistan since 2011.  Canada's combat role was terminated in July 2011 and Canada presently has approximately 950 trainers in Afghanistan.

Since 1996, the military has recorded 187 suicides among its members.  The causes for suicides can of course be a number of things, but many can now be attributed to service in Afghanistan and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).  There have been several high profile cases, but many have not in the public eye.

The military has gotten much better in dealing with PTSD, especially since deployment to the former Yugoslavia, when lip service was still paid to it.  During the Bosnian war, debriefing teams of professionals were deployed to counsel troops and provide a means for debriefing them after actions.

After the initial deployment to Afghanistan the decision was reached to send troops for a week long debrief to Cyprus, prior to returning to Canada.  In the meantime education was provided to commanders and troops in the recognition of symptoms of PTSD.  This education is being extended to military spouses.

Private focus groups have also provided a means for troops to educate themselves.  Much of the problems had to do with the military culture where troops, especially combat troops, are hesitant to report any problems they may be dealing with.  Often a soldier withdraws and in the worst case they commit suicide.

The problem becomes larger with the number of reserve soldiers who have served in Afghanistan and don't  have the unit support structure available to regular troops.  The good news is that efforts have been made to recognize and deal with the problems.  Support groups seem to be one of the best approaches, but those are not readily available to soldiers living in remote areas or outside of the urban centres.

Mental health screening has also been increased since 2009 and soldiers must attend post deployment sessions with mental health staff.

Chief of Defence Staff Walter Natynczyk told a Senate committee on Monday that even with the gold standard of recruitment and all of the screening techniques available, it is impossible to identify every vulnerable soldier.

Canada has lost 158 soldiers in Afghanistan, many of them victims of Improvised Explosive Devices, where their fellow soldier were involved in securing the area and picking up the pieces.  All things considered, although one suicide is too many, overall with thousands of troops having served in Afghanistan, it could have been much worse.

It is up to the Canadian Forces, Veterans Affairs and Canadians to ensure our emotionally wounded warriors are taken care of.

Sunday, 29 April 2012

British Aid Worker Decapitated in Pakistan - The War of Terror is Over

While a senior official in the Obama Administration uttered the words this week "The War on Terror is Over," a British aid worker's decapitated body was found in Quetta, Pakistan on Sunday morning.  The body of Khalil Rasjed Dale, 60 was  found with a note staing he was killed after his captors' demands were not met, police said.  The body was found in an apple orchard outside of Quetta, Pakistan.

Khalil Rasjed Dale was abducted on January 5th.  A British Muslim, Dale had been managing a health programme in Quetta for almost a year.

The International Red Cross (ICRC) has  condemned the killing in the strongest possible terms as has the British government.

 "This was a senseless and cruel act, targeting someone whose role was to help the people of Pakistan, and causing immeasurable pain to those who knew Mr Dale," British Foreign Secretary William Hague said in London.

According to a police surgeon at Bolan Medical College in Quetta said that some of his joints had been dislocated "because the body was forcibly stuffed into the bag,"

This killing comes just days after a senior official in the State Department, according to the National Journal proclaimed that "The War on Terror is over."

 “Now that we have killed most of al Qaida,” the source said, “now that people have come to see legitimate means of expression, people who once might have gone into al Qaida see an opportunity for a legitimate Islamism.”

Since it's unknown what prompted the statement, one can only assume that it was made to support the NATO exit from Afghanistan in 2014.  Unfortunately, soldiers and civilians are still killed at alarming rates and the Taliban apparently is far from being done.

 Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri claimed responsibility and demanded that Washington end air strikes in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen, and release the 1993 World Trade Center bombers and relatives of Osama bin Laden.


There seems to be a misrepresentation based on facts on the ground and what the Obama Administration wants us to believe.  While the Afghan Security Forces are being trained, it is also apparent that many of the facts are being hidden.   Those are the mistrust of Afghan Security Forces and the Afghan population towards foreigners, the severe problems with drugs and high absentee rates.

We can stick our heads in the sand or face up to reality.  What is needed here is a decision to either fully disengage from Afghanistan now, or get serious about truth and face reality.   The questionis,  "Is it worthwhile to waste one more year and then  commit to another decade in a supporting role that will cost over $4Billion."

Saturday, 28 April 2012

DoD US Military Casualties In Afghanistan as of 27 Apr 2012

 As the security for Afghanistan transfers to the control of Afghan Security Forces, another 12 U.S. soldiers have given their life in the war torn country.  Six soldiers were killed in action (KIA), six died of other causes, while an additional 41 joined the wounded warriors.  

NATO ministers met this week to discuss the way ahead in Afghanistan, ahead of a summit to be held in Chicago in May.  The U.S. and Afghanistan announced that a "Strategic Partnership Treaty" had been finalized, ready for signature by President Obama and Afghan President Hamid Karzai.  The treaty was to deal with supporting and funding approximately 352,000 Afghan soldiers and policeman by 2014.  Afghan Forces are expected to level at 228,500.  

Total cost of the package is expected to be about $4.2 Billion, of which the U.S. has committed to paying $4.2 Billion.  The treaty also addresses residual NATO/US troop strength post 2014 and the issue of night raids by special forces has also been addressed.  The U.S. has apparently made a concession on that issue and all night raids will now be planned and led by Afghan Security Forces.

Australia has announced that it will withdraw its troops by the end of this year, one year ahead of schedule, while the UK is going ahead with a withdrawal of 500 troops this year.  Apparently the Pentagon/White House have requested that Australia and Canada leave a small contingent of troops, probably Special Forces beyond 2014 to assist Afghans with training and in the capture of insurgents. Of course there is still the issue of insurgents in Pakistan.  

NATO leaders are making it clear that they are not prepared to leave Afghanistan to its own vices and that they will assist the Afghan government in any way they can to assure success and end the war in Afghanistan.  

In the US the election general election campaign is in full swing with both sides spouting rhetoric to demonize the other.  Americans can expect one of the dirtiest campaigns, full of Super PAC ads that will be beyond belief.  As Mitt Romney has all but wrapped up the GOP nomination, the White House and the Obama campaign have turned their focus on Romney and of course the Romney campaign on the incumbent President.  With the campaigns in full swing now, the winners are the media that air those ads, which cost obscene amounts.  One would think with an economy still struggling, millions of unemployed and on food stamps or other assistance, this money could be used better elsewhere.  

The global economy at best is shaky.  The Dutch government collapsed over austerity measures.  French President Nicolas Sarkozy is facing a run-off election and Germany's Angela Merkel is under pressure to quit subsidizing the rest of Europe.  

Needless to say there is a lot of pressure on governments to stop spending money on wars and to get out of Afghanistan.   Meanwhile troops are still putting their life on the line daily in Afghanistan.  Just yesterday the 410th British soldier died in Helmand Province.  Take a moment this week and think about those sacrificing their life.  Lest We Forget.

Below are this week’s updated DoD casualty figures:

Op Enduring Freedom                  Total Deaths       KIA   Non Hostile              WIA

Afghanistan Only                                   1828               1516        312                     15713
Other Locations                                        112                   12        100
DoD Civ Casualties                                      3                     1            2
Worldwide Total                                     1943                1529        414                    15713

Accumulated 2012 Casualties:

KIA            Non Combat Deaths             WIA

  62                            43                               535

 List of Casualties at Casualties.org

Friday, 27 April 2012

British Soldier Killed in Helmand Province, Afghanistan

Another British soldier has been killed in Afghanistan.  The soldier was a member of the 1st Battalion Grenadier Guards.

The British Ministry of Defence made the announcement on its website:

It is with sadness that the Ministry of Defence must announce that a soldier from the 1st Battalion Grenadier Guards was killed in Afghanistan today, 27 April 2012.

 The soldier, a member of Combined Force Nahr-e Saraj (North), was on a patrol to disrupt insurgent movements in the area, when he was hit by small arms fire.

Spokesman for Task Force Helmand, Major Ian Lawrence, said:
"Sadly, I must report that today a soldier from 1st Battalion Grenadier Guards has died of a gunshot wound sustained while onpatrol in the Nahr-e Saraj district of Helmand province.
"The thoughts and prayers of all in the Task Force and Combined Force are with his family and friends at this tragic time."
The soldier's family have been informed and have asked for a period of 24 hours grace before further details are released.


The battalion deployed to Helmand as part of Operation Herrick 16 and is scheduled to return to Britain in the autumn.  The Army said Operation Herrick 16 was designed to "push back" the Taliban.

It said: "When we go into the villages and districts in Helmand we are supported by Afghan Army and Afghan Police who hold the ground we have cleared, to prevent the Taliban returning."

The Grenadier Guards previously deployed to Afghanistan in 2007 and during 2009 - 2010, and are playing a key ceremonial role during the Queen's Diamond Jubilee.

The UK has just announced that they will withdraw 500 British troops from Afghanistan, stating that the Afghan Security Forces were strong enough to permit this withdrawal.

This is the 410th soldier to have died in Afghanistan, since deployment in October 2001.

UK to Withdraw 500 Troops from Afghanistan

Despite some concern, privately, by some British commanders, UK Defence Minister Phillip Hammond has announced the withdrawal of 500 British troops from Afghanistan.  Hammond said that Afghan Security Forces were now strong enough to permit 500 British troops to return home.

Hammond said in a statement to MPs in the House of Commons that the security situation in three districts in Helmand province were now unrecognizable compared to the situation on the ground when British operations first started in 2006.  He said that 36 checkpoints and patrol bases in Helmand province had been handed over to the Afghan police and army over the last six months.  Two satellite headquarters in the province would be merged into one.  In addition 200 front line troops will be relocated from front line positions to "ground holding" support operations.

The draw down of the British contingent from 9,500 troops to 9,000 was announced last year, but was based on conditions on the ground and the recommendations of the Chief of the Defence Staff, General Sir David Richards. 

While the insurgency still poses a real threat, Hammond said that Afghan Security Forces were vastly improved, a situation, which allowed the construction of 30 extra schools and 29 health clinics.  He said that prosperity was the key in fighting the insurgency.

"Prosperity will be a critical weapon in the battle against the insurgency," he said "In the last year alone, income levels in Helmand have increased by 20%."

During the past six months, Hammond said, that Afghan Security Forces had  cleared more than 200 compounds, made safe 44 improvised explosive devices, found seven bomb-making factories and confiscated over 145 kilograms of homemade explosives.

 "The success of that operation further demonstrated their increasing professionalism and capability. The reality on the ground is that Afghan forces are increasingly taking the lead."

British Commanders, who  had just returned from Afghanistan, said that Helmand province was insulated from the unrest of the rest of the country, which was provoked by the behaviour of American troops, but there is some concern by British commanders on what the effects of a withdrawal of 16,000 US troops from Helmand will have on the situation.

NATO has gone into full exit mode.  Earlier this week, the U.S. finalized a Strategic Planning Treaty, which is ready for signature by both President Obama and President Hamid Karzai.  There was the issue of funding requirements for some 352,000 Afghan troops by the end of next year.  President Karzai had demanded that the US commit to $2 Billion in writing.  The total cost is expected to be $4.2 Billion, of which the US will cover approximately $2.1 Billion.

According to RT TV, NATO and the US will have troops in Afghanistan until 2024.  The size and scope is not known, however they will be providing support and training.  Canadian media reported recently that Canada and Australia had been asked leave a small contingent of forces in place.  Speculation is that those will be special forces.

Australia has announced that it will withdraw its 1500 troops by the end of 2013, one year ahead of schedule.  France has also given its intend to exit one year early.

Despite the optimistic outlook by most NATO countries, there is still a lot of concern over Afghanistan's ability to cope with the insurgency.  Recently coordinated attacks in Kabul and Eastern Afghanistan have raised serious concerns.

President Obama will hold a summit in Chicago in May.  More details should be made public then. 

Thursday, 26 April 2012

Canada's Role in Afghanistan Post 2014

A media report says that the United States have asked Canada and Australia to keep a small contingent of forces in Afghanistan after NATO's withdrawal in 2014.  Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper has not ruled out extending Canada's military role.  When the issue was raised by New Democratic leader Thomas Mulcair during Question Period, Harper said that the government would examine all options if asked if to leave special forces in theatre to assist with training and capturing insurgents.

"As we approach that date, we will examine all options and we will take the decision that is in the best interest of this country and in the best interest of our security objectives for the globe,"Harper said.

Canada's elite Joint Task Force 2 has been in Afghanistan since 2001.  Presently Canada has a contingent of approximately 900 trainers in the war torn region.  Canada's combat mission ended in July 2011. 

With a public weary of war and Canada's role as fighters rather than peacekeepers, the New Democrats have a winning issue.  The New Democratic Party leader was outraged at Harper's remarks and said that his party would not support any extension and that Canada must pull out as planned.  An extension would be a violation of a parliamentary motion, which required the combat mission to end last year.

"Canadians do not want another Conservative extension of the mission in Afghanistan and the NDP will not support one," said Mulcair.

The Prime Minister fired back,   "It's not a remarkable statement that the NDP won't support the mission,"the NDP couldn't even make up its mind to support (the Second World War)."

Harper's reply was that the government would not make its decision on a knee jerk response by the New Democrats. 

This was a bit of a low blow on behalf of the Prime Minister, since the New Democrats were not in existence during World War II.  In fact the party had its origins in the Canadian Labour Congress and CCF.  The CCF was formed in 1932 and the CLC.  A merger in 1956 formed the New Democrats. 

The situation in Afghanistan, to say the least, has been votile, especially since the Koran burning and the massacre of 17 civilians in a village near Kandahar. 

NATO has recently completed a "Strategic Partnership Treaty" with Afghanistan, a plan that calls for $4 Billion in funding to support Afghan Security Forces, expected to grow to 352,000 this year, but would level at 228,500 by 2017.  The United States is expected to foot $2.3 Billion of the $4 Billion bill. 

The treaty, which is expected to be signed before a summit in Chicago next month, will be the framework for support post 2014.  The U.S. has already made several concessions to President Hamid Karzai, including the conduct of night raids, which are now to be led and approved by Afghans.  Karzai had also demanded that the U.S. commit to $2 Billion in funding in writing.

In any case, besides the pressure from the United States there will be pressure from Canada's NATO allies.  Australia's Prime Minister Gillard has already announced its withdrawal, one year early, in 2013.  French President Sarkozy has also given signals for an  early withdrawal.

Canada has lost 158 soldiers in Afghanistan, a heavy toll for a nation of 31 Million people.